Level 2 HACCP

Module 3: The seven HACCP principles

Connect hazard analysis, CCPs, limits, monitoring, corrective action, verification and records with real food-handling decisions.

Video runtime: 12:07

What you will learn in this module
  • The seven principles connect the hazard with a control, its checks, failures, verification and evidence.
  • Monitoring is a real, correctly timed check, not copied or guessed paperwork.
  • Honest records connect checks with corrective action; do not invent a missed result.

Load this video from YouTube. Your browser will connect to YouTube; embedding follows your cookie preferences.

External playback does not record on-page study progress.

Module 3: The seven HACCP principles

Module 3: The seven HACCP principles

Connect hazard analysis, CCPs, limits, monitoring, corrective action, verification and records with real food-handling decisions.

Records your study progress, not an assessment result or certificate.

Key points

  • The seven principles connect the hazard with a control, its checks, failures, verification and evidence.
  • Recognise and report hazards at each stage rather than waiting until the finished food looks unsafe.
  • CCPs are process-specific essential controls; prerequisite hygiene remains necessary even when it is not a CCP.
  • Know the defined limit for your assigned check; record and report a failure rather than changing the standard.
  • Monitoring is a real, correctly timed check, not copied or guessed paperwork.
  • Correct the affected food’s risk as well as the control failure; an equipment adjustment alone is not proof of safety.
  • Verification compares procedures and records with real working conditions and identifies recurring weaknesses.
  • Honest records connect checks with corrective action; do not invent a missed result.

Lesson guide

3.1 The seven principles together

The seven principles form a connected system: identify hazards, determine critical control points, set critical limits, monitor them, take corrective action, verify the system and keep suitable documentation and records. Learning the words is useful only when you understand how they work together.

Cooking chicken is the module’s example: a hazard needs a cooking control, a defined acceptable standard, a real check and action if that standard is not reached. Managers also check the process and records to see whether it is effective. Follow your workplace’s approved method and limits; this overview does not supply a new numerical cooking standard or turn every kitchen activity into a CCP.

3.2 Identify hazards

Hazard analysis looks for microbiological, physical, chemical and allergenic hazards at the stages where food is received, stored, prepared, cooked or served. A relevant hazard might be bacterial growth in warm food, raw contamination of salad, chemicals stored unsafely or inaccurate allergen information.

At Level 2, you help by recognising hazards in your own work and reporting them. Out-of-date food, damaged packaging, pest signs, chemical contamination and uncertainty about ingredients are not issues to ignore until a manager next reviews the plan. Follow the controls you have been trained to use and bring unexpected conditions to the responsible person’s attention. Hazard analysis is a planned business task, supported by accurate information from daily work.

3.3 Identify critical control points

A CCP is a process step at which control is essential for a significant hazard. Cooking chicken can be such a step. Storage, reheating or an allergen control may be critical in a particular process, but the HACCP plan must determine this rather than applying the same list to every business.

Cleaning, hygiene, pest prevention and other basic good practices remain important even where managed as prerequisite controls rather than CCPs. Your role is to follow the identified controls, not decide during service that one can be skipped. If a critical check fails, do not release the food merely because other tasks have been completed. Inform the responsible person and follow the corrective procedure.

3.4 Set critical limits

A critical limit separates an acceptable condition from an unacceptable one at the CCP. Depending on the process it may involve temperature, time, pH, water activity or another specified measurable criterion. Supplier or visual criteria may feature in a particular approved control, but should not be invented by an untrained handler.

Know the actual limit for the check assigned to you and use the stated method. A fridge reading above its limit cannot be made acceptable by writing a lower number. Record the real result, protect affected food and report the failure. At Level 2, do not choose a convenient new limit or borrow an unrelated business’s standard when you are uncertain. Ask for the correct instruction.

3.5 Monitor the controls

Monitoring means checking a control at the correct time and in the correct way so a failure can be recognised. It can include delivery, storage, cooking, cooling, reheating, holding, date, cleaning, allergen or pest checks under the workplace system.

The right person needs the right equipment and instruction. A number copied from yesterday is not a temperature check, and a tick added without doing the work is not evidence of control. Complete the real check when required, record what you find and report results outside the standard. Rushing forms during service hides rather than controls risk. If you cannot complete a required check, tell the responsible person; do not make up the missing result.

3.6 Take corrective action

Corrective action deals with a control that has failed. Chicken that has not met the cooking standard may need further cooking and a recheck where safe. A warm fridge requires assessment of how long food was affected, action on the food and correction of the equipment or procedure.

Missed cleaning may require work to stop while the area is cleaned and disinfected. A wrong allergen ingredient or order must be stopped immediately and reported. Record the failure and action, and ask the responsible person when uncertain. Turning up a hot-holding unit or adjusting a fridge does not automatically make food already exposed to unsuitable conditions safe. Unsafe food must not be served to avoid waste.

3.7 Verify that the system works

Verification checks whether the system is being followed and remains effective. Managers may review temperature, storage, cleaning, allergen, complaint and corrective-action records, observe staff and check equipment. These checks are different from a handler’s individual monitoring result.

A cleaning form marked complete while the kitchen is dirty is a warning that records and reality do not agree. A probe needs to be suitable, clean and working; a broken probe or unclear record needs reporting. Repeated failures require investigation and improvements rather than endless normal-looking ticks. Support verification by making real checks, reporting problems and being able to explain the procedure you actually use.

3.8 Keep documentation and records

Documentation describes the plan, procedures, flow of work, suppliers and responsibilities. Records show the checks and actions completed: temperatures, deliveries, cleaning, pest activity, allergen information, training and responses to failures. Together they help the business understand and demonstrate its controls.

Keep entries honest and clear. Do not guess a missed result, copy figures or backfill a check as though it happened. If a check was missed, report that fact and follow the corrective instruction. Perfect-looking paperwork with no real checks is weaker than an accurate record of a problem and its response. Records must remain useful to the people reviewing the system, not merely look tidy on inspection day.

In practice

Chicken fails its cooking check

Source teaching example rewritten as a formative scenario; not a real reported incident

The recorded cooking result is below the business’s approved standard.

Can a completed sheet justify service?

Do not serve. Follow the corrective procedure, continue cooking and recheck only where safe, or escalate an uncertain food decision.

The limit and actual food safety result determine release, not whether the form is filled in.

Perfect cleaning records, dirty slicer

Source teaching example rewritten as a formative scenario; not a real reported incident

A supervisor finds food residues on a slicer despite a completed cleaning form.

What does this say about verification?

Compare the record with actual practice, correct the cleaning problem and investigate the mismatch.

Verification asks whether controls work in practice, not just whether a record exists.

Reflect on your learning

What is a critical limit?

Select one answer.

Are cleaning and hygiene unimportant if they are not CCPs?

Select one answer.

Does turning up a hot unit prove affected food is safe?

Select one answer.

What should happen after a missed check?

Select one answer.

For your own learning — not the certification assessment.

FAQs

How do monitoring and verification differ?

Monitoring performs the specified control check. Verification reviews records, staff practice and conditions to see whether the system is followed and effective.

Can I set my own critical limit?

Not as an untrained Level 2 handler. Follow the business’s approved limit and method, and ask if the instruction is unclear.

Why keep both procedures and completed records?

Procedures describe how the system should work; records show actual checks, failures and action. Both must agree with real practice.

Further reading

  • Food safety management systems for businesses (opens a new tab)

    Supplementary overview of HACCP-based procedures, checks and records.

    UK Government / Food Standards Agency. Applicable jurisdiction: UK overview; check the relevant national regulator and business-specific rules. Supplementary reading; checked 2026-10-07.

  • CookSafe: keeping food safety records (opens a new tab)

    Supplementary guidance on monitoring, corrective action, verification and review records.

    Food Standards Scotland. Applicable jurisdiction: Scotland; catering businesses. Supplementary reading; checked 2026-10-07.

  • CookSafe: House Rules (opens a new tab)

    Role-specific training and practical hygiene, maintenance, temperature, stock and allergen controls.

    Food Standards Scotland. Applicable jurisdiction: Scotland; catering businesses. Supplementary reading; checked 2026-10-07.

Jump to a key moment
Transcript

[0:00] Welcome to lesson 3.1 overview of the
[0:02] hack principles.
[0:04] Hack is based on a set of principles
[0:06] that help food businesses manage food
[0:08] safety in a planned and organised way.
[0:11] At level two, you do not need to write a
[0:13] full hack plan, but you should
[0:15] understand how the principles work and
[0:16] how they affect your daily tasks. The
[0:19] hacked principles include identifying
[0:21] food safety hazards, identifying the
[0:24] points where those hazards must be
[0:25] controlled, setting safe limits,
[0:27] monitoring those controls, taking
[0:29] corrective action when things go wrong,
[0:31] checking the system works, and keeping
[0:33] records.
[0:35] For example, if a business cooks
[0:37] chicken, the hazard may be harmful
[0:38] bacteria.
[0:40] The control point may be cooking. The
[0:43] safe limit may be the cooking standard
[0:45] required by the business.
[0:47] Monitoring may involve checking the food
[0:49] properly. Corrective action may be
[0:51] cooking it for longer if it has not
[0:53] reached the required standard. Records
[0:56] may then show what was checked and what
[0:58] action was taken. Hack helps staff
[1:00] understand that food safety is not based
[1:02] on guesswork. It is based on identifying
[1:06] risks and controlling them before unsafe
[1:08] food reaches the customer. The key
[1:10] message is hacked principles give food
[1:12] businesses a clear method for managing
[1:14] hazards, checking controls, and acting
[1:16] quickly when something is not safe.
[1:19] Welcome to lesson 3.2, identifying
[1:22] hazards. The first part of hack is
[1:25] identifying hazards. A hazard is
[1:27] anything that could make food unsafe to
[1:29] eat. The main food safety hazards are
[1:32] microbiological, physical, chemical, and
[1:35] allergenic.
[1:36] Microbiological hazards include harmful
[1:39] bacteria, viruses, parasites, and molds.
[1:43] Physical hazards include objects such as
[1:45] glass, metal, plastic, hair, jewelry, or
[1:48] broken packaging. Chemical hazards
[1:51] include cleaning products, sanitizer
[1:53] residue, pest control chemicals, or
[1:55] other harmful substances.
[1:58] Allergenic hazards include allergens
[1:59] that are not declared or allergens that
[2:01] transfer by cross contact. To identify
[2:05] hazards, the business looks at each
[2:06] stage of the food process.
[2:09] This may include delivery, storage,
[2:11] preparation, cooking, cooling,
[2:14] reheating, service, display, takeaway,
[2:17] and delivery. For example, during
[2:20] delivery, chilled food may arrive too
[2:22] warm. During storage, raw meat may drip
[2:25] onto ready to eat food. During
[2:28] preparation, dirty equipment may spread
[2:30] bacteria.
[2:32] During service, the wrong allergen
[2:34] information may be given to a customer.
[2:36] At level two, your role is to stay alert
[2:39] to hazards during your work. If you see
[2:42] damaged packaging, outofdate food, pest
[2:44] signs, poor storage, chemical
[2:46] contamination, crosscontamination, or
[2:49] anything unsafe, report it. The key
[2:52] messages: identifying hazards means
[2:54] thinking about what could go wrong
[2:55] before it causes harm. Hacked starts
[2:58] with recognizing the risks.
[3:01] Welcome to lesson 3.3, Identifying
[3:04] Critical Control Points. A critical
[3:07] control point, often called a CCP, is a
[3:10] stage in the food process where control
[3:12] is essential to prevent, remove, or
[3:14] reduce a food safety hazard to a safe
[3:16] level. Not every control is a critical
[3:19] control point. Some controls are
[3:22] important general hygiene practices such
[3:24] as cleaning, personal hygiene, and pest
[3:27] control. A critical control point is
[3:30] usually a step where failure could
[3:31] directly lead to unsafe food. For
[3:34] example, cooking chicken may be a
[3:36] critical control point because harmful
[3:38] bacteria may survive if the chicken is
[3:40] undercooked. Chilled storage may also be
[3:43] critical for certain high-risk foods
[3:44] because bacteria can grow if the food
[3:46] becomes too warm. Another example is
[3:49] reheating food. If food is not reheated
[3:53] properly, bacteria that have grown
[3:55] during storage may survive. In some
[3:58] businesses, allergen controls may also
[4:00] be critical because giving wrong
[4:01] allergen information or serving the
[4:03] wrong food could seriously harm a
[4:05] customer. At level two, you may not
[4:08] decide which points are critical, but
[4:10] you must follow the controls your
[4:11] workplace has identified. If your
[4:14] procedure says a cooking check must be
[4:16] completed, it must be done properly. If
[4:19] food does not meet the required
[4:20] standard, you must not serve it. The key
[4:23] message is critical control points are
[4:25] the stages where food safety must be
[4:27] controlled. Staff must understand these
[4:30] points and never take shortcuts with
[4:32] them. Welcome to lesson 3.4, setting
[4:35] critical limits. A critical limit is the
[4:38] safe boundary that must be met at a
[4:40] critical control point. In simple terms,
[4:43] it tells staff what is acceptable and
[4:45] what is not acceptable. Critical limits
[4:48] may be based on temperature, time,
[4:50] appearance, pH, water activity, supplier
[4:54] standards, or other food safety
[4:55] requirements depending on the process.
[4:59] For example, a business may set a
[5:01] cooking limit for certain foods to make
[5:02] sure harmful bacteria are destroyed. A
[5:06] chilled storage limit may make sure
[5:07] high-risisk food stays cold enough. A
[5:10] hot holding limit may make sure food
[5:12] stays hot enough during service. At
[5:15] level two, you do not usually set
[5:17] critical limits yourself, but you must
[5:19] know the limits in your workplace
[5:20] procedures and follow them. For example,
[5:23] if a fridge check shows the fridge is
[5:25] too warm, the limit has not been met.
[5:28] The correct response is not to write
[5:30] down a safe number or ignore the
[5:32] reading. The correct response is to
[5:34] report it and follow the corrective
[5:36] action procedure. Critical limits help
[5:38] remove guesswork.
[5:40] Staff should not decide that food is
[5:42] probably fine when it has failed a
[5:44] required check. The key message is
[5:47] critical limits tell us when food safety
[5:49] is under control. If the limit is not
[5:52] met, staff must take action before food
[5:54] is served or sold.
[5:56] Welcome to lesson 3.5. Monitoring
[5:59] controls.
[6:01] Monitoring means checking that food
[6:02] safety controls are working in hack.
[6:05] Monitoring is important because it helps
[6:07] staff spot problems before unsafe food
[6:10] reaches the customer. Monitoring may
[6:12] include checking fridge temperatures,
[6:14] freezer temperatures, cooking
[6:16] temperatures, reheating temperatures,
[6:18] hot holding, cold holding, delivery
[6:20] conditions, use by dates, cleaning
[6:23] completion, allergen controls, or pest
[6:25] signs.
[6:27] For example, if a fridge temperature is
[6:29] checked and recorded during the shift,
[6:30] staff can confirm whether chilled food
[6:32] is being kept under control. If the
[6:35] fridge is too warm, action can be taken
[6:37] before the food becomes unsafe.
[6:40] Monitoring must be done at the right
[6:42] time, in the right way, and by the right
[6:44] person. If a check is rushed, guessed,
[6:47] or copied from yesterday's record, it
[6:49] does not protect food safety. At level
[6:52] two, you may be asked to complete checks
[6:54] as part of your normal work. You must
[6:57] complete them honestly and report any
[6:59] result that is outside the safe limit.
[7:01] Monitoring is not just paperwork.
[7:04] It is an active food safety control.
[7:07] For example, checking that cooked food
[7:09] is hot enough, checking that raw and
[7:11] ready to eat foods are separated, or
[7:13] checking that an allergen order has been
[7:15] prepared correctly can all prevent harm.
[7:18] The key messages: monitoring means
[7:20] checking controls before things go
[7:22] wrong. Honest checks help protect
[7:24] customers and support due diligence.
[7:27] Welcome to lesson 3.6, corrective action
[7:30] when things go wrong.
[7:32] Corrective action means what you do when
[7:34] a food safety control fails. In hack, it
[7:38] is not enough to notice a problem. Staff
[7:41] must take action to control the risk.
[7:44] For example, if food has not cooked
[7:46] properly, the corrective action may be
[7:48] to continue cooking and check again. If
[7:50] a fridge is too warm, the corrective
[7:52] action may be to report it, move food to
[7:55] another fridge, check how long the food
[7:57] has been affected, and dispose of unsafe
[7:59] food if needed. If a cleaning task was
[8:02] missed, the corrective action may be to
[8:04] clean and disinfect the area before food
[8:06] preparation continues.
[8:08] If the wrong allergen information is
[8:10] given or the wrong food is prepared for
[8:12] an allergic customer, the food must be
[8:14] stopped and the issue reported
[8:15] immediately.
[8:17] Corrective action should be recorded
[8:19] where required. This shows what went
[8:21] wrong and what was done to protect
[8:23] customers. At level two, your role is to
[8:26] report problems honestly and follow the
[8:28] workplace procedure.
[8:30] Never hide a failed check, change a
[8:32] record to make it look safe, or serve
[8:34] food when safety is uncertain.
[8:37] For example, if a hot holding unit drops
[8:39] below the required standard, do not
[8:41] simply turn it up and carry on without
[8:43] checking the food. Follow the procedure
[8:46] and ask the responsible person. The key
[8:49] message is corrective action protects
[8:51] customers when something goes wrong.
[8:54] Spot the problem, stop the risk, report
[8:56] it, and record the action taken. Welcome
[8:59] to lesson 3.7. Checking the system is
[9:02] working. Hack is not something a
[9:04] business writes once and forgets. The
[9:07] system must be checked to make sure it
[9:09] is working. This is sometimes called
[9:12] verification.
[9:13] It means checking that the food safety
[9:15] procedures, controls, and records are
[9:18] actually protecting food in real life.
[9:21] Managers may check the system by
[9:22] reviewing records, watching staff work,
[9:25] checking temperatures, inspecting
[9:27] storage areas, checking cleaning
[9:28] standards, reviewing complaints,
[9:30] checking allergen procedures, or testing
[9:32] staff knowledge. For example, if the
[9:35] records show that cleaning is completed
[9:37] every day, a manager may still check
[9:39] whether surfaces and equipment are
[9:41] actually clean. If records look perfect,
[9:44] but the kitchen is dirty, the system is
[9:46] not working properly. Another example is
[9:49] cooking records. If food is recorded as
[9:52] cooked safely, managers may check
[9:54] whether staff are using the probe
[9:56] correctly and cleaning it between uses.
[9:58] At level two, your role is to follow
[10:01] procedures properly and answer honestly
[10:02] if asked how a check is done. If
[10:05] something is not working, such as a
[10:07] broken thermometer, unclear record
[10:09] sheet, or unsafe process, you should
[10:11] report it. Checking the system also
[10:14] helps the business improve. If the same
[10:17] problem happens repeatedly, the
[10:18] procedure may need changing. The key
[10:21] message is hacked must be checked,
[10:23] reviewed, and improved.
[10:25] A system only works when records, staff
[10:28] behaviour, and real food safety controls
[10:30] match. Welcome to lesson 3.8. Records
[10:34] and documentation.
[10:36] Records and documentation are an
[10:38] important part of hack because they
[10:39] provide evidence that food safety is
[10:41] being managed.
[10:43] Records may include fridge and freezer
[10:45] checks, cooking temperatures, reheating
[10:47] checks, cooling records, delivery
[10:50] checks, cleaning schedules, pest
[10:52] reports, allergen records, staff
[10:54] training records, and corrective action
[10:56] notes. Documentation may include the
[10:59] food safety policy, safe methods,
[11:01] procedures, hack plans, flow diagrams,
[11:04] supplier information, and instructions
[11:06] for staff. At level two, the most
[11:09] important thing to remember is that
[11:11] records must be honest and accurate.
[11:13] Never write down a temperature without
[11:15] checking it. Never tick cleaning as
[11:18] complete if it was not done. Never copy
[11:21] yesterday's record. Never change
[11:24] paperwork to hide a mistake. A mischeck
[11:27] is a problem, but a false record is
[11:29] worse because it hides the risk and may
[11:31] allow unsafe food to be served. For
[11:33] example, if a fridge is too warm, write
[11:36] the real result and report it. The food
[11:39] may need to be moved, checked, or
[11:41] disposed of, and the action should be
[11:43] recorded. Good records help managers
[11:45] spot patterns. A fridge that slowly gets
[11:48] warmer over several days may be failing.
[11:51] A cleaning task that is often missed may
[11:54] need better supervision. The key
[11:56] messages, hack records are not just
[11:58] paperwork.
[12:00] They show whether food safety is under
[12:02] control, but only if they are completed
[12:03] honestly and used properly.